哈迪塞镇之战

HD中字

主演:内详

类型:电影地区:英国语言:英语年份:2007

 量子

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 优质

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 红牛

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 非凡

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 剧照

哈迪塞镇之战 剧照 NO.1哈迪塞镇之战 剧照 NO.2哈迪塞镇之战 剧照 NO.3哈迪塞镇之战 剧照 NO.4哈迪塞镇之战 剧照 NO.5哈迪塞镇之战 剧照 NO.6哈迪塞镇之战 剧照 NO.13哈迪塞镇之战 剧照 NO.14哈迪塞镇之战 剧照 NO.15哈迪塞镇之战 剧照 NO.16哈迪塞镇之战 剧照 NO.17哈迪塞镇之战 剧照 NO.18哈迪塞镇之战 剧照 NO.19哈迪塞镇之战 剧照 NO.20

 剧情介绍

 长篇影评

 1 ) 什么才是真实

    对这样的一部电影来说,任何的拍摄手法都显得次要了,重要的是题材和真实性的命题。我是比较讨厌美国这个国家的,但是美国人倒是挺讨人喜欢,虽然我一个都没接触过。伊拉克的问题我也关心不过来,我更关心的是大米是不是真要涨价了。可别人家的问题外人死皮赖脸的非要进去插一脚,换做是谁谁也不会乐意。看了这部电影你会对美国大兵异常反感厌恶甚至产生当人肉炸弹的冲动,拿来作为基地组织的宣传影片还非常不错,可事实真的是这样么?恐怕不是这么简简单单。晚上看奶茶刘若英为某品牌电视打的广告,说“知未明,观未见”,那需要的是怎样的一种高度?豆瓣上居然现在还不到三十人看过这部电影,少见啊。四星。

 2 ) 哈迪萨事件的英文wiki资料以及IMDB影评

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_for_Haditha
Battle for Haditha (film)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haditha_killings
Haditha killings

google translate
http://translate.google.com.hk/?hl=zh-TW&tab=wT
-------------------------------

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0870211/reviews
影评

 65 out of 83 people found the following review useful:
Powerful & Provocative Film, 12 November 2007
8/10
Author: Black Narcissus from Maida Vale, UK

I saw this film at it's London premiere at the Odeon West End as part of the London Film Festival.

I guess Nick Broomfield was getting sick & tired of seeing Michael Moore ripping off his Documentary style so made this his Second feature film in as many years. Like the earlier film, Ghosts (www.imdb.com/title/tt0872202/), the Battle for Haditha is based on fact.

The film tells story of the events of November 19, 2005, when a troop of US Marines exact revenge for an earlier attack which killed one of their number in the Iraqi town of Haditha.

The Film focuses on three different viewpoints, the first of Iraqi insurgents, which in this case isn't some mad Mullah but an old man, who we learn is an ex-Army officer and his son. The second focuses on a Corporal Ruiz, a young Marine who you feel wants to be anywhere but Iraqi and the finally the film focuses on a young Iraqi couple and their extended family.

The film is shot Cinéma-vérité style and at times is very harrowing. But it's to Broomfields credit that he to my mind he doesn't simply demonize the US soldiers. Instead you get to understand how young men put in a situation that you the viewer couldn't understand let alone cope with, could just lose it after a comrade is killed. Likewise, in the films portrayal of the insurgent fighters Broomfield manages to make you think what would you do, if, as in the film, your a professional soldier made jobless by a an Occupying force. How do you feed your family, and wouldn't you feel some resentment to the occupation forces for making you jobless. But it's in the Iraqi families, caught between the US forces and the Insurgents that the film is at it's best. They can't do the right thing for doing wrong. It is they who bear the brunt of either Insurgency retaliation or US Forces heavy-handedness. They who ultimately will and are the losers in Film.

This is a powerful film which deals with all aspects of the problem fair mindedly, but doesn't shy away from the truth. Don't let those who haven't watched the film put you off seeing the best portrayal of the War on Terror to date.

Black Narcissus

--------------------------------------------------
 71 out of 95 people found the following review useful:
Made me cry., 21 March 2008
9/10
Author: bluelionk

Made me cry.

Only issues I noticed are: That the translation of the spoken Arabic is sometimes misleading and has no relation with what they actually said.

Some of the actors' accents are not Iraqi (Palestian, Egyptian, and others...), but most are Iraqis.

It's still a great movie that shows what happens in Iraq, and that war is ugly.

It's one of the rare movies that show the issue from the other side.

The acting is great, so is the scenery (it does look a lot like Iraq).

I say it again, it made me cry, a lot.

--------------------------------------------------

 48 out of 75 people found the following review useful:
If You Liked Bloody Sunday & United 93, 19 September 2007
9/10
Author: Movie-Jay from Toronto, Canada

I just saw this movie at the Toronto Film Festival, and it's going to create much controversy as the weeks pass until this film finally opens. I think those who are against a movie before they even see it are saying something about themselves, not the film. Watch it, and then make up your mind. This movie, like United 93 or Bloody Sunday, is told moment to moment, keeps it's head down and just moves forward without judgment or commentary. The movie isn't aware of the past or future, it only knows what it knows through the characters we follow, some of whom are American soldiers, some are innocent Iraqi families, others are terrorists. This movie does a wise thing by simply showing things from all points of view. I can't wait until it's released because it needs to be talked about.

At the premiere for the film, we learn that many of the actors on the American front are actually soldiers who fought in Iraq. The head of the platoon is especially good, and could go on and have a career as an actor.
--------------------------------------------------

 30 out of 41 people found the following review useful:
A story that needed to be told, 13 August 2008
8/10
Author: insomnia from Australia

It's almost impossible to be totally objective regarding a subject about which one is truly passionate. The war in Iraq is a subject that divides people like no other in recent times. As with any conflict, the war in Iraq has its supporters and its detractors. There is no middle ground. There are no grey areas: everything is just black or white. Either you believe it's a justifiable war, or you don't. This brings me to Nick Broomfield's new film, "The Battle For Haditha". The subject of the film is controversial as it deals with an incident in the city of Haditha, allegedly involving the US Marines. Broomfield uses actors, some of whom are former US Marines and Iraq veterans, as well as Iraqi refugees, to fashion a film that successfully straddles the gap between a regular documentary and a straightforward feature film. The film encompasses three points of view: those of the Marines, the insurgents, and the families who lived near where the roadside bomb detonated. This film is a fictionalised account of what actually happened at Haditha. It shows quite graphically, the horrors of war and what the Americans as well as innocent Iraqis have to go through almost on a daily basis. There are deaths on both sides, but it's Iraqi civilians who are caught in the crossfire and who have to bear the brunt of dealing with men who have been stretched to breaking point. The film in no way condones the actions of either the insurgents or the Marines. It just shows the audience what might have occurred on that fateful day, and it's for those in the audience to make up their own minds as to who was in the right and who was in the wrong. When reading some of the comments posted on the message board for this film, I find it somewhat puzzling that some contributors write that "Battle For Haditha" is anti-American. Just because the US Marines are shown in a less than sympathetic light in this film, does not mean the film is on the side of the insurgents. What the film does demonstrate is how quickly things can get out of hand, in a situation such as that in Haditha. By all means criticize a film on its merits, or lack of them. Please, though, do not label this film as un-American just because it doesn't fit a blinkered view of the way the world is.
--------------------------------------------------
 26 out of 39 people found the following review useful:
better than i expected, 1 April 2008
8/10
Author: SEVEREcritic from Bangladesh

i personally never heard of Mr. Bloomfield, so i had no real intention of watching this film till i saw it mentioned in the message boards for other films. that said, i must say this was the best in the recent slew of Iraq war films (like Redacted, Home of the Brave, etc.) i half expected it to be like Redacted and was pleasantly surprised to find it much better. i think it really brought out the fact that there are multiple sides to a story, and did so without too much bias. being a Muslim myself i must admit that it seemed a little inclined towards Iraqis, with Marines portrayed as undisciplined and emotionless (though one of the protagonists feels guilt and in reality this incident caused an uproar). there are no A-list actors, which in a sense, actually made the movie better because you almost see the actors as the characters themselves (especially since a lot of the dialog is improvised). i think it was well made, and well thought out. better than expected. i wonder what the US reaction would if/when it has a release there? unlike Moore's work (as stated by another user here) neither party is shown as completely innocent or completely evil. i'm not sure if this is exactly how the incident took place, but if it is, then there is certainly some food for thought in this movie.

 3 ) 得不到你的心,就糟蹋你的肉体,然后拂袖而去

伊拉克其实也是中东地区的一个缩影。美国看上了石油资源,为了控制这个国家,就必须建立一个亲美政权,但是萨达姆是标准的教法制治国,美国人就只能颠覆旧政权,打着民主的旗号,重新建立傀儡政权,这么些年过去了,从奥巴马执政期内,美国人也认识到了,民主是不太可能在教法伊斯兰国家内结合共存的,虽然有土耳其的例子,可是土耳其是所有伊斯兰国家都得不到的爸爸,完全不同,无法效仿。最后开始逐渐撤军撤资源,留下了满目疮痍混乱不堪的伊拉克。同样还有非洲的利比亚,等等等等。美国的政治,就像一个五六岁的孩子,拥有无止境的欲望和手段,得到了就贪婪的榨取,得不到就摧毁一切让别人也无法得到。

 4 ) 愤怒的杀戮

2022.01.17

路边炸弹爆炸,把美军士兵炸的血肉模糊,这让其他美军异常愤怒,失去理智而大开杀戒、滥杀无辜,美军泄愤的做法固然可恶而不可饶恕,反过来说看到有人在路边埋炸弹也知道危险降临,除了报告村长,劝说已经怀孕的媳妇去亲戚家避风头,大难临头居然再无作为,领着老老少少一大家子人等死。发现妻子不见了,冲动的跑出去大呼小叫,引来美军当活靶子射杀,更是愚蠢至极。伊拉克男人咋那么木讷?是相信美军是仁义之师,不会滥杀无辜?那可就是上吊拴脚脖子,记错地方了。

路边炸弹爆炸后,不远处一辆白色轿车里面五个男人居然一动不动的呆在车里,一副看热闹不嫌事大的劲头,可能还庆幸选了个第一排,岂不知屎壳郎拴在鞭梢上,光知道腾云驾雾,不知道死在眼前。疯狂的美军像抓小鸡一样把他们从车里拎出来一个个的毙了,成了的替罪羊。伊拉克男人真的很愚钝。至于火上浇油在自家院子里向美军胡乱开枪射击就更是引火烧身的脑残行为。可怜之人必有可恨之处。

 5 ) 鹬蚌相争,渔翁得利!

看完这部13年前的电影发表一下我个人的看法。 第一:从美国人角度上来说,一群被恐怖分子激怒了的美军冲上民宅肆意杀戮平民,显示出在那些镜头里风光的美军作战素养之差和心理素质是多么的不堪一击!从美军平均20岁的年龄来看,他们都是群心智还未成熟的小伙子。只经过正常的教官训教但是还未经过实战磨炼就上战场,看到一个队友被杀就沉不住气想要报仇雪恨,见人就杀。这反映出了美军基层士兵的普遍不遵守纪律和心理素质较差。也从大量下了战场就容易得精神疾病的数据就可以看出美军基层士兵真正软弱的地方。当然,也侧面反映了美军士兵要是没有强大的武器和科技,这种士兵很难有所作为,要不上战场就不听指挥个人英雄主义严重,要不打完子弹或者被包围没有空中支援和后援就会崩溃投降。 第二:从恐怖分子的角度上来说无疑这样做是很成功的。用最低的成本就可以激怒美国大兵。然后利用美军杀戮平民既能在国际舆论上打击美国人,又能利用伊拉克民众对美国人仇恨的种子壮大自己的实力。可谓一箭三雕!站在恐怖分子的角度来说十分完美!

第三:从伊拉克被屠杀的平民角度分析,我觉得这群人活该!虽然这样说很不人道。但是,事实就是这群没有战争观念的平民百姓,明明看到了有人在路边埋炸弹,却装作什么都不知道。就像鲁迅先生骂自己国人那样,——麻木不仁!是的,你可以选择给美国人告发也可以选择收拾东西逃跑。但是他们偏偏装作什么都不知道。既不想得罪美国人也害怕恐怖分子报复!这样的不作为最终害了自己,害了家人。成了恐怖分子的利用工具。对于这种没有明显战争观念,自己的国家被外族占领,他们还在慢悠悠过日子的民族和平民,我是真的没有一丝同情。他们的麻木不仁,自私自利,也注定了他们需要付出生命的代价!

再说个题外话,看完这部电影其实我想的不是美国人是多么的“虚伪”,伊拉克人是多么的"可怜"。我唯一想到的就是,鹬蚌相争,渔翁得利!正是因为伊拉克战争的泥潭拖住了美国人,才有了中国发展的10年黄金期。中国应该感谢伊拉克这群恐怖分子和广大人民的牺牲,为自己争得了这宝贵的战略发展期。现在正逢中美科技战贸易战,美国已经腾出了手开始和中国全面对抗了!中国应该冷静分析,总结教训,如果未来哪天中美爆发热战,中国应该多多利用美军基层士兵的软弱心理和作战素养的差劲来痛击美军!当然,美军也有王牌部队。我们一定要提前研究美军,除了研究他们的武器装备和信息化作战体系外。我们更应该研究"心理战"!

————————————————————————

最后谈谈这部电影,我觉得这部电影用纪录片的形式叙述这件惨案过于冗长。导演用了几乎1/2的时间交代背景。最后的重头戏,战争场面镜头才区区10来分钟,既没有渲染出战争的残酷,又让人看的很平淡无聊。我基本上是快进往过看的。要不是真实故事改编,这电影拍的也确实够"无趣"。

 6 ) 追求和平,远离战争

 看完新片《哈迪塞镇之战》,我很头痛。这部影片真实地再现了美军端掉萨达姆政权后,伊拉克的现状。

 

        前面部分主要是为后面的战争做铺垫的,交待了三方面的场景。一是,美国海军陆战队员一天的大致工作任务;主要是训练,巡逻。二是,伊拉克游击队员,一老一年轻的两名战士,他们买来汽油炸弹,准备起事端。三是,一户普通伊拉克家庭,他们有着勉强幸福的生活。矛盾在炸弹爆炸的那一瞬间激化。在一辆美军汽车路过时,老战士引爆了炸弹,一死两伤。其他美国海军陆战队员奋起战斗,两名伊拉克战士边打边退,迅速撤离现场。愤怒的美军先是枪杀一辆汽车里的四名男士;接着,在得到上级许可后,他们对附近房屋展开血洗,出现了最惨烈的一幕。不管屋里有没有人,不管屋里是大人小孩还是老人,不管屋里是男人还是女人,发疯的美军为了报仇,疯狂扔手雷,疯狂用M16扫射。几间房屋顷刻遍地尸体,燃烧大火,成为废墟......与此同时,美军基地中心对可以人员进行定点清除,凡见几名阿拉伯男子在路上,5秒过后,导弹就会将他们从地球上抹去。另外,狙击手到位,进行杀人游戏。...

 

        刚看时,你可能会对美军感到同情,因为他们年纪轻轻,跑到伊拉克来受罪,他们是战争的受害者。但是,当你看见他们对手无寸铁的伊拉克人民进行屠杀时,你会认为他们是十足的恶棍。最后,因为媒体对事件的曝光,上级为了美国海军的声誉把他们抛弃,他们仍然没有好下场。

 

        伊拉克战士在这场战斗中好发无损,可以说他们取得了一次小小的胜利。但是老战士在看到因为他们的所作所为引起美军对自己同胞的屠戮时,他显得十分痛苦。

 

    伊拉克人民是这次战斗的最大受害者。在事发之初,就有人对他们的命运作了说明:如果告诉美军有人在公路上安置了炸弹,那么伊拉克战士不会让他们活命;如果他们对美军保持缄默,美军会要了他们的命。不管他们是作为还是不作为,结局一样。有脑子转得快的早就弃家逃跑,剩下的居民希望维持现状,换句话说,面对这场博弈,他们保持了沉默,所以成了美军的靶子。

 

    有些台词可能传世。比如,伊拉克老战士说,上帝呀,我的所为给人民带来了灾难。~~那是怎样一种心情哪!本该退伍的他,还说,我参军并不是为萨达姆,我是为国家而战。美军将领为死去的战士祈祷时说:愿主给予美国海军勇气和力量。我倒希望美军不要那么强大,不要那么咄咄逼人。美军战士说:我恨死那些当官的了,他们只会给我们没用的奖章。当你获得奖章时,你可曾想到那是用阿拉伯人民的鲜血换来的。还有技术人员的那句:给我5秒。5秒钟,利用GPS和卫星图像,他们可以肆意清除任何不满意的人员。美军狙击手得到“可以对任何移动的物体做必要的处理”的指示,这意味着,他们可以随意点杀平民。有一处场景就是狙击手射杀一名阿族男子,可恶的是,他们竟然开了几枪,还笑嘻嘻的吹嘘自己的枪法牛逼。

 

    故事情节很简单。它只给我们描绘了伊拉克千千万万类似战斗中的一次,它只是几年来伊拉克状况的一个缩影;足矣,通过它,我们完全可以搞清楚伊拉克现在是怎么回事儿。没有迷宫式的故事结构,没有绚烂的画面,没有超酷的音效,没有大牌;有的只是真实的写实的纪实的事实。

 

    死去的美军战士,他们的家庭从此破灭;没死的美军战士,从20多岁起,整个一生将会在噩梦中度过。他们自认为是处境危险的弱势群体,可当他们在屠杀的过程中,他们可曾有一点人性?生还下来的伊拉克人民,阿拉伯民族,他们有的不是对美军维持社会治安的感激,他们有的只是对美国的仇恨,他们化悲痛为力量,他们怒喊着要为死去的家人报仇。不难想象,美军必定会陷入伊拉克人民自杀性爆炸的包围之中。

 

    获得奖章的美军士兵说我们胜利了,但战争还远远没有结束,谁也说不上谁赢谁输。实际上,伊拉克的矛盾异常复杂,谁也搞不清楚以后会发生什么。美国大兵还说,他厌倦了这一切,他感到“麻木到失去知觉”,我建议他听听LP的numb。

  

    这部电影为爱好和平的观众而作,为善于反思的观众而作,为反战人士而作。追求和平,远离战争,这是当代世界的主题。

 

        

 

 短评

无解的悲剧,每个人都身处其中,都觉得自己的是无辜的。事实却是别人利益博弈的棋子,既是受害者也是施暴者,没有人是无辜的。

7分钟前
  • shanglin117
  • 推荐

仇恨滋生仇恨,冤冤相报何时了?战争是泯灭人性的苦难,不义的战争是苦难的巅峰。交战双方那些为了个人利益不顾他人死活操纵民众、士兵的政客和煽动者是最可恶最该死的!拍得很真实很震撼!给战争下了一个绝佳的定义

12分钟前
  • 开心小眯猫
  • 力荐

阿拉伯人的命就比美国人贱吗?路边炸弹这么多是阿拉伯平民造成的吗?那些滥杀无辜的美国陆战队员有错吗?复仇复仇,杀戮杀戮,这样的恶性循环,错在何人、何处?

17分钟前
  • 庐陵
  • 推荐

真实事件改编,借用伪纪录片风格、去类型化地还原了美军在伊拉克的治安战困境,更具象的体现了家园置身于战火的悲剧,极尽冷峻纪实,让观众看到了是非对错一定程度上处于模糊地带的真实战场,美军和恐怖分子相互地袭击、报复、仇杀,结果付出最惨重代价地却是被无辜裹挟其间的普通人:平民看到恐怖分子埋炸弹却不敢报信给美军,因为怕恐怖分子报复,但攻击一旦成功,他们就像片中那样被失去理智的美国大兵无差别的杀戮,连老幼妇孺都不放过,他们唯一错的就是自己的国家成为了战场,没有任何逃生的出口,甚至连搞恐怖袭击的都不过是极端分子花钱雇来执行任务的主儿。而美军士兵杀人没得洗,但他们也不过是帝国掌权者谋取政治经济利益的工具,敌意像螺旋一样上升,真正的刽子手坐收渔利,战场的真相任强者涂抹,真正的元凶,却从头到尾都没露面。

21分钟前
  • 洛梦蝶
  • 推荐

其实就感情而言十分理解美军在战争中犯下的错,还算不上罪行。毕竟战争本身就是残酷的,会将人逼疯。身处在其中也多身不由己,把问题拿出来大家一起解决而不是隐藏才是解决问题方法。

25分钟前
  • 雨滴在心头
  • 还行

过于的追求技术上的真实与视角的全面,反而显得缺乏真实,而流于表面。

26分钟前
  • 畸小山
  • 还行

老百姓从媒体、教科书上看到的是什么?是事件。是媒体甚至政府想告诉你的事件,是不是真相?真不知道。运气好的话,过一阵或者过几十年,水干了,露出一些河底的真相,运气不好,观众永远做傻子。你以为朝鲜人的智商很低,整天为金正恩哭天抢地?他们只是国家教育下的傻子,我们若在那个地方,也一样。

29分钟前
  • 小蚪
  • 还行

好的战争片,最终表达的应该都是反战的。这部电影更像是一种还原,对真相的重新演绎,对战争的重新反馈,对平民的重新伤害。战争中受害最深的永远是陷入深渊的无法找到出路的平民。这个村子的人,在看到所谓的恐怖分子埋炸弹时,不敢告诉美国人,因为如果被叛军发现,注定是死。但不告诉美国人,就发生了影片中的担忧,他们作为最无辜的人被失去理智疯狂报复的美国人击杀。无法博弈,在这场战争中没有任何逃命空间。而恐怖分子是,真正的叛军雇来的市民,他们对两边都是无所谓的状态,都讨厌,却会为钱卖命。事实就是这样,人执行命令,人受到伤害,人疯狂报复,人无辜被杀。政治,社会,意识,就这样混乱。而这一切,还是乱入的战争。

32分钟前
  • 熊仔饼干
  • 推荐

这两帮人天天都要把人脑打出猪脑才算完,却还要生活在同一个城市中,伊拉克到底是一个怎样的国家啊。

36分钟前
  • fallingraining
  • 推荐

想起了南京大屠杀,全世界人民都应该看清美国的嘴脸

41分钟前
  • 质哥
  • 推荐

以后下完电影一定要先过一遍看字幕完整不完整,我下的这个版本大概50分钟左右就没有字幕了,幸好战争题材台词成分比较少,还是能看明白个大概,我挺喜欢这种强调纪实性的电影,没有过分英雄化任何人,真实的揭示了战争给人们带来的灾难,有反思,有警示,你不杀人,人就会杀你,就这么简单。

42分钟前
  • Doublebitch
  • 推荐

279 常看到很多人自豪的说,没当过兵的男人不是真男人,或许从动物本能天性来说确实如此。美利坚海军陆战队算是世界上最牛皮哄哄的兵了吧,是男人就下一百层,地狱

45分钟前
  • 木有
  • 推荐

美军禽兽不如

49分钟前
  • ピラミッド
  • 推荐

战争就是这样一个人性的黑洞,它逼迫你放弃代价高昂的准则,以换取失去了意义的胜利。

50分钟前
  • 猪头妖怪
  • 还行

就这片子还能看出反战意味来?还有说士兵和平民都无辜的,圣母这个词转为你造的,真是佩服。从战略上讲这tm是洗衣粉战争,是侵略战争,从战术上讲这是对手无寸铁的平民单方面的屠杀,跟主反省两句,流下两滴鳄鱼的眼泪,象征性的被追究下责任,就洗清罪恶了?拍个电影都要拿反战当遮羞布,美国佬最近打脸已经打出新高度了,你把他以前说的话说一遍都相当于在骂他。

51分钟前
  • 纸会割人
  • 还行

伪纪录片形式。真实感强烈。美军高层和伊拉克武装分子们虚伪的打着各自的幌子而让他们的同胞——前线的美国大兵和伊拉克平民成为无辜受害者。漫漫长夜你们何以安心入睡?

55分钟前
  • HsvEvnX
  • 推荐

对比1999年的《夺金三王》,2007年的《哈迪赛之战》。前者是部喜剧片,对萨达姆军队的贪婪残暴戏谑调侃,伊拉克百姓喜迎天兵。后者是部严肃纪实的电影,突出了美军的残暴猖狂,伊拉克人对美军充满敌意,游击队对美军不停的袭扰让其精神崩溃。拍这部电影的时候还在调查阶段,直到2012年参与屠杀的美军只有一人被判九十天监禁(没执行),其他人无罪,伊拉克部分死者每人陪了两千五百美元,有敌意的死者未获赔偿。

59分钟前
  • wrzyy
  • 推荐

这片让我想起《鬼子来了》。当年抗战时,民众真的像宣传的那样很支持游击队打仗吗?小老百姓只想活着罢了。顺便吐槽一下短评顶最高的一条,平民不一定无辜,高官不一定冷血,而冲在前面的也不一定都是被洗脑的傻逼。

1小时前
  • Homer
  • 推荐

伊拉克哈迪塞镇,I.D.E工厂..IDE使陆战队车队一死二伤,失去兄弟的MC疯狂了,接下的搜索任务中15名伊拉克平民无辜死去。被幕后黑手煽动的伊拉人纷纷拿起步枪,造成平民死亡的陆战队员们也面临审讯...这场战争到底谁错了?值观?宗教信仰?谁最无辜?伊拉克人民?士兵?当权者之间的矛盾导致了这些悲剧

1小时前
  • 雷斯特雷波
  • 推荐

也算是比较中性的角度,对伊拉克的普通人、极端主义者,对美国陆战队的士兵、将军。尽管不能得到所有的全面的comment,这种多角度考虑的尝试总是有利于世界和平滴,卡卡

1小时前
  • lmp
  • 推荐